[Octopus-devel] syntax of functions

[Heiko Appel]

Hi 

On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:32:54PM +0200, Xavier Andrade wrote:
> I vote for 1). What if use some kind of "i" for complex numbers? Like
> real+i*imag.

ok. I also vote for 1) since it is least invasive and people 
are more used to this form from textbook notation. Since we 
reached quorum I'll take care of the required changes.

The complex "i" is already implemented, cf.

 static struct init_cnst arith_cnts[] 

in symbols.c

best wishes,

	Heiko
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.tddft.org/pipermail/octopus-devel/attachments/20060524/2b568c02/attachment.bin