[Octopus-devel] syntax of functions
appel at physik.fu-berlin.de
Wed May 24 11:45:43 WEST 2006
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:32:54PM +0200, Xavier Andrade wrote:
> I vote for 1). What if use some kind of "i" for complex numbers? Like
ok. I also vote for 1) since it is least invasive and people
are more used to this form from textbook notation. Since we
reached quorum I'll take care of the required changes.
The complex "i" is already implemented, cf.
static struct init_cnst arith_cnts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.tddft.org/pipermail/octopus-devel/attachments/20060524/2b568c02/attachment.bin
More information about the Octopus-devel