[Octopus-devel] bug or what?

[Xavier Andrade]

Hi,

Then I don't understand why it was failing in the first time, if gsl 1.10
defines both macros there should be no problem using the old one? I thought
that 1.10 didn't define AM_PATH_GSL anymore and that 1.9 defined both.

In any case I think we should keep the macro in the distribution.

Cheers,

Xavier

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Florian Lorenzen wrote:

>
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
>
>
> At Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:10:18 +0100 (CET),
>
> Xavier Andrade wrote:
>
>> It is strange, my version of gsl (Debian Sid) defines it (and defines an
>
>> alias for AM_PATH_GSL). From what I can see in the configure, the builbots
>
>> have gsl in a non-standard location, so perhaps the autoreconf part is
>
>> not getting the same gsl installation.
>
> I checked, this macro is not in the plain vanilla distribution of GSL. It is
>
> most likely a patch by the Debian folks.
>
>
>
>> I don't like the idea of including gsl, but I like Miguel's idea of
>
>> including just the macro.
>
> Then let's put it in.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Florian
>
>