[Octopus-devel] Release Re: [Octopus-notify] svn commit: r7796 - in trunk/src: main utils by marques
micael at teor.fis.uc.pt
Thu Apr 28 13:46:44 WEST 2011
About libxc, a new release of the library would be useful even without
the octopus release, as many bugs have been fixed and other codes using
the library would benefit from it.
As for the sign of the electric fields, I would vote to have the
particles with the right sign, even if this means we will have to do
many changes in the code.
On 04/28/2011 11:33 AM, Alberto Castro wrote:
> Hi all,
> Also, we should make a decision about the sign of the electric fields
> (my mail of the 9th of April).
> Cheers, Alberto.
> 2011/4/28 Xavier Andrade<xavier at tddft.org>:
>> Hi all,
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:41 AM,<octopus-svn at tddft.org> wrote:
>>> I would propose that we all make an effort to correct _all_ unitialized variables, memory leaks, and tests, and then release the new version.
>> The problem is that we cannot release Octopus until we release a new
>> version of libxc. With the recent changes in the API of libxc we
>> cannot compile against the released version.
>> In fact, this will be the first time we release without libxc. I am
>> afraid, this will make Octopus even more difficult to the users to
>> Octopus-devel mailing list
>> Octopus-devel at tddft.org
More information about the Octopus-devel