[Octopus-users] octopus fails all tests in make check

[Alberto Castro]

Hi,

Could you add the line

DebugLevel = 10

to the input file, and send the resulting output?

Alberto.

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 listemily at eml.cc wrote:

> I'm very happy to say that now I can actually compile octopus (ver
> 2.1.0)!
>
> I switched to a machine that has intel fortran, and installed GSL, FFTW,
> ARPACK and SPARSKIT.
>
> I used
>     setenv ifort
>
>     setenv FCFLAGS "-u -zero -fpp1 -nbs -pc80 -pad -align -unroll -O3
>     -ip -tpp7 -xW"
>
>     ./configure --with-gsl-prefix='/home/username/octopus/n33/'
>     --disable-python --with-fft-lib='-L/home/username/octopus/n33/lib'
>     --prefix='/home/username/octopus/n33'
>     --with-sparskit='-L/home/username/octopus/n33/SPARSKIT2 -lskit'
>     --with-arpack='-L/home/username/octopus/n33/ARPACK -larpack_SUN4'
>
>     make
>     make install
>     make check
>
> And unfortunately it fails all of the tests.  The manual says this
> indicates a problem with the executable, such as a missing shared
> library.
>
> I started it up anyway, with the "hello world" sodium atom example from
> the wiki.  At first I got the same output shown there, but then it hung
> at:
>
> ******************** Loading restart information *********************
>
> ** Warning:
> **   Could not load wave-functions from 'tmp/restart_gs'
> **   Starting from scratch!
>
> Info: Unnormalized total charge =      0.999665
> Info: Renormalized total charge =      1.000000
> Info: Setting up Hamiltonian.
> Input: [LCAOStart = lcao_full]
> Info: Performing initial LCAO calculation with    2 orbitals.
>    SystemName = 'Na'
>       CalculationMode = gs
>       %Coordinates
>         'Na' | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0
>       %
>
>
> So, with apologies that I again need assistance, I'm hoping somebody can
> give me some clues about where to start looking for this missing shared
> library?  It seems like configure would have complained if I was missing
> a library?   I'm attaching the config.log, but don't see anything there
> that seems obviously wrong.
>
> :) Emily
>
>
>
>