[Octopus-users] octopus fails all tests in make check
listemily at eml.cc
listemily at eml.cc
Fri Oct 27 14:51:17 WEST 2006
Thanks for helping...
With DebugLevel=100 I get the same output in the file "out" as I got
before, but on the terminal I get messages. The last messages before
the hang are:
p
* O 6.897982 0.090000 44312 |
..|..|..|..|..|lcao_inc.Xlcao_init
* O 6.901916 0.100000 44312 | ..|..|..|..|lcao.lcao_init
* I 6.906079 4.940000 44312 | ..|..|..|..|lcao.lcao_wf
* I 6.910289 4.940000 44312 | ..|..|..|..|..|lcao_inc.Xlcao_wf
* I 6.916407 4.950000 45124 | ..|..|..|..|..|..|h_inc.Xvlpsi
* O 6.922608 0.010000 45124 | ..|..|..|..|..|..|h_inc.Xvlpsi
* I 6.927039 4.960000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|states_inc.Xstates_dotp
* I 6.934412 4.960000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|..|mf_inc.Xmf_dotp
* O 6.939100 0.000000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|..|mf_inc.Xmf_dotp
* O 6.943651 0.000000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|states_inc.Xstates_dotp
* I 6.947401 4.960000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|states_inc.Xstates_dotp
* I 6.951263 4.960000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|..|mf_inc.Xmf_dotp
* O 6.955141 0.000000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|..|mf_inc.Xmf_dotp
* O 6.959400 0.000000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|states_inc.Xstates_dotp
* I 6.964222 4.960000 45124 | ..|..|..|..|..|..|h_inc.Xvlpsi
* O 6.970365 0.000000 45124 | ..|..|..|..|..|..|h_inc.Xvlpsi
* I 6.974645 4.960000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|states_inc.Xstates_dotp
* I 6.978249 4.960000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|..|mf_inc.Xmf_dotp
* O 6.982801 0.000000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|..|mf_inc.Xmf_dotp
* O 6.987003 0.000000 45124 |
..|..|..|..|..|..|states_inc.Xstates_dotp
And ldd does not give any "not found", only:
ldd ../bin/octopus
liblapack.so.3 => /usr/lib/liblapack.so.3 (0x00111000)
libblas.so.3 => /usr/lib/libblas.so.3 (0x005e0000)
libgsl.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0 (0x00783000)
libgslcblas.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 (0x00631000)
libimf.so => /usr/local/intel/fc/9.0/lib/libimf.so (0x008e7000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00ba6000)
libsvml.so => /usr/local/intel/fc/9.0/lib/libsvml.so
(0x006a8000)
libifport.so.5 => /usr/local/intel/fc/9.0/lib/libifport.so.5
(0x00660000)
libifcore.so.5 => /usr/local/intel/fc/9.0/lib/libifcore.so.5
(0x00ef2000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00687000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00d75000)
libg2c.so.0 => /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0 (0x00cbb000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0076c000)
I don't know whether the absoft compiler was the problem or not, only
that I got farther along towards a working octopus by switching to the
intel compiler. But I also changed machines, because I didn't have
ifort on the first machine. So it could have been something else that
changed...
----- Original message -----
From: "Heiko Appel" <appel at physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: octopus-users at tddft.org
Cc: listemily at eml.cc
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:12:35 +0200
Subject: Re: [Octopus-users] octopus fails all tests in make check
Hi Emily,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:02:19PM -0400, listemily at eml.cc wrote:
> I'm very happy to say that now I can actually compile octopus (ver
> 2.1.0)!
sounds good! :)
> I switched to a machine that has intel fortran, and installed GSL, FFTW,
> ARPACK and SPARSKIT.
the Absoft compiler had a problem in the end?
> And unfortunately it fails all of the tests. The manual says this
> indicates a problem with the executable, such as a missing shared
> library.
yes, sometimes that is the origin of failed tests. But then octopus
typically does not start up at all, i.e. the tests fail because no
output was generated.
> Info: Unnormalized total charge = 0.999665
> Info: Renormalized total charge = 1.000000
> Info: Setting up Hamiltonian.
> Input: [LCAOStart = lcao_full]
> Info: Performing initial LCAO calculation with 2 orbitals.
> SystemName = 'Na'
> CalculationMode = gs
> %Coordinates
> 'Na' | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0
> %
could you add something like
DebugLevel = 100
to your input file, repeat the run and send the tail of the output?
> So, with apologies that I again need assistance, I'm hoping somebody can
> give me some clues about where to start looking for this missing shared
> library? It seems like configure would have complained if I was missing
> a library?
don't think that you are missing a library at runtime. Nevertheless,
what
do you get when you run
ldd ./octopus
Any "=> not found" in the output?
best wishes,
Heiko
--
Heiko Appel | Tel +49 (0)30 838 53038
Freie Universität Berlin | Fax +49 (0)30 838 55258
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Arnimallee 14, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
PGP-Fingerprint: 802F 864F ED41 63EA 6A14 8E53 ABB6 A33F 20DA DF94
More information about the Octopus-users
mailing list